3 From \(h^-\) to Bernoulli numerators
There exists \(z\in \mathbb {Z}_p\) such that
inside \(\mathbb {Q}_p\).
Starting from theorem 2.5, the proof indexes the odd characters by powers of the Teichmuller character. The boundary character \(\omega ^{p-2}\) contributes a factor congruent to \(1\) modulo \(p\), so it can be absorbed into the error term \(pz\).
There exists \(z\in \mathbb {Z}_p\) such that
inside \(\mathbb {Q}_p\).
Replace every generalized Bernoulli factor in theorem 3.1 by the congruent classical factor from theorem 1.7. The integrality statement lemma 1.6 keeps each replacement inside \(\mathbb {Z}_p\) and collects all errors into one multiple of \(p\).
The odd index range \(j{\lt}p-2\) is equivalent to the classical even Bernoulli range:
If \(j\) is odd, write \(j=2k-1\), so \(j+1=2k\). Conversely, an even index \(2k\) in the Kummer range corresponds to \(j=2k-1\). The remaining inequalities are elementary arithmetic in natural numbers.
For \(p\) odd,
By theorem 3.2, \(h^-\) is congruent modulo \(p\) to a finite product of \(p\)-adic integers
The factor \(-1/2\) and the denominator \(j+1\) are \(p\)-adic units in the range. Thus the product is divisible by \(p\) exactly when at least one Bernoulli numerator is divisible by \(p\). Finally lemma 3.3 rewrites \(j+1\) as \(2k\) and gives the usual range \(1\le k\), \(2k\le p-3\).
If \(p\nmid h^-(K)\), then for every \(k\) with \(1\le k\) and \(2k\le p-3\),
This is the contrapositive direction of theorem 3.4. If some numerator were divisible by \(p\), then the theorem would imply \(p\mid h^-(K)\).