Kummer’s Criterion

3 From \(h^-\) to Bernoulli numerators

Theorem 3.1

There exists \(z\in \mathbb {Z}_p\) such that

\[ h^-(K) = \prod _{\substack {j{\lt}p-2\\ j\ \mathrm{odd}}} \left(-\frac12 B_{1,\omega ^j}\right) + pz \]

inside \(\mathbb {Q}_p\).

Proof

Starting from theorem 2.5, the proof indexes the odd characters by powers of the Teichmuller character. The boundary character \(\omega ^{p-2}\) contributes a factor congruent to \(1\) modulo \(p\), so it can be absorbed into the error term \(pz\).

Theorem 3.2

There exists \(z\in \mathbb {Z}_p\) such that

\[ h^-(K) = \prod _{\substack {j{\lt}p-2\\ j\ \mathrm{odd}}} \left(-\frac12\frac{B_{j+1}}{j+1}\right) + pz \]

inside \(\mathbb {Q}_p\).

Proof

Replace every generalized Bernoulli factor in theorem 3.1 by the congruent classical factor from theorem 1.7. The integrality statement lemma 1.6 keeps each replacement inside \(\mathbb {Z}_p\) and collects all errors into one multiple of \(p\).

Lemma 3.3

The odd index range \(j{\lt}p-2\) is equivalent to the classical even Bernoulli range:

\[ \exists j,\ j{\lt}p-2,\ j\ \mathrm{odd},\ Q(j+1) \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \exists k,\ 1\le k,\ 2k\le p-3,\ Q(2k). \]
Proof

If \(j\) is odd, write \(j=2k-1\), so \(j+1=2k\). Conversely, an even index \(2k\) in the Kummer range corresponds to \(j=2k-1\). The remaining inequalities are elementary arithmetic in natural numbers.

For \(p\) odd,

\[ p\mid h^-(K) \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \exists k,\ 1\le k,\ 2k\le p-3,\quad p\mid \operatorname {num}(B_{2k}). \]
Proof

By theorem 3.2, \(h^-\) is congruent modulo \(p\) to a finite product of \(p\)-adic integers

\[ -\frac12\frac{B_{j+1}}{j+1}. \]

The factor \(-1/2\) and the denominator \(j+1\) are \(p\)-adic units in the range. Thus the product is divisible by \(p\) exactly when at least one Bernoulli numerator is divisible by \(p\). Finally lemma 3.3 rewrites \(j+1\) as \(2k\) and gives the usual range \(1\le k\), \(2k\le p-3\).

Theorem 3.5

If \(p\nmid h^-(K)\), then for every \(k\) with \(1\le k\) and \(2k\le p-3\),

\[ p\nmid \operatorname {num}(B_{2k}). \]
Proof

This is the contrapositive direction of theorem 3.4. If some numerator were divisible by \(p\), then the theorem would imply \(p\mid h^-(K)\).