Kummer’s Criterion

3 The relative class number

Definition 3.1
#

The inclusion \(\mathcal O_{K^+}\subseteq \mathcal O_K\) induces, by extension of fractional ideals, the class-group homomorphism

\[ \mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O_{K^+})\longrightarrow \mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O_K). \]
Theorem 3.2

For an odd prime cyclotomic field, the map

\[ \mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O_{K^+})\longrightarrow \mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O_K) \]

is injective.

Proof

A group homomorphism is injective when its kernel is trivial. If an ideal class of \(\mathcal O_{K^+}\) maps to the trivial class, a representative ideal becomes principal after extension to \(\mathcal O_K\); by theorem 2.10 the representative was already principal, so the class is trivial.

Theorem 3.3

The plus class number divides the full class number:

\[ h^+(K)\mid h(K). \]
Proof

By theorem 3.2, \(\mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O_{K^+})\) embeds as a subgroup of the finite group \(\mathrm{Cl}(\mathcal O_K)\), and Lagrange’s theorem gives the divisibility of cardinalities.

Definition 3.4
#

The relative class number is the natural-number quotient

\[ h^-(K)=h(K)/h^+(K), \]

which is well defined by theorem 3.3.

Theorem 3.5

The class number factors as

\[ h(K)=h^+(K)\, h^-(K). \]
Proof

Multiply the defining quotient of definition 3.4 by \(h^+(K)\); this is legitimate in \(\mathbb {N}\) because \(h^+(K) \mid h(K)\) (theorem 3.3) and \(h^+(K) \ne 0\).

Theorem 3.6

Assume that a separate argument proves the implication

\[ p\mid h^+(K)\Longrightarrow p\mid h^-(K). \]

Then

\[ p\mid h(K)\Longleftrightarrow p\mid h^-(K). \]
Proof

Write \(h(K) = h^+(K)\, h^-(K)\) by theorem 3.5. If \(p \mid h(K)\), then by primality \(p\mid h^+(K)\) or \(p\mid h^-(K)\), and the first alternative implies the second by hypothesis; either way \(p \mid h^-(K)\). Conversely \(h^-(K)\) divides \(h(K)\), so \(p \mid h^-(K)\) implies \(p \mid h(K)\).